Hi, Friendly ping (second one):
Who can ack/review/take this patch, please? Thanks -- Gustavo On 12/19/18 6:08 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Hi, Friendly ping: Who can ack or review this patch, please? Thanks -- Gustavo On 11/27/18 10:34 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114996 ("Missing break in switch") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]> --- drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_hipd.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_hipd.c b/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_hipd.c index 0a2a54517b15..054fb0599263 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_hipd.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_hipd.c @@ -3072,6 +3072,7 @@ static void sym_sir_bad_scsi_status(struct sym_hcb *np, int num, struct sym_ccb sym_print_addr(cp->cmd, "%s\n", s_status == S_BUSY ? "BUSY" : "QUEUE FULL\n"); } + /* fall through */ default: /* S_INT, S_INT_COND_MET, S_CONFLICT */ sym_complete_error (np, cp); break; @@ -4632,6 +4633,7 @@ static void sym_int_sir(struct sym_hcb *np) * Negotiation failed. * Target does not want answer message. */ + /* fall through */ case SIR_NEGO_PROTO: sym_nego_default(np, tp, cp); goto out;
