‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Thursday, January 10, 2019 11:52 PM, Qian Cai <c...@lca.pw> wrote:

> On 1/10/19 10:15 PM, Esme wrote:
>
> > > > [ 75.793150] RIP: 0010:rb_insert_color+0x189/0x1480
> > >
> > > What's in that line? Try,
> > > $ ./scripts/faddr2line vmlinux rb_insert_color+0x189/0x1480
> >
> > rb_insert_color+0x189/0x1480:
> > __rb_insert at /home/files/git/linux/lib/rbtree.c:131
> > (inlined by) rb_insert_color at /home/files/git/linux/lib/rbtree.c:452
>
> gparent = rb_red_parent(parent);
>
> tmp = gparent->rb_right; <-- GFP triggered here.
>
> It suggests gparent is NULL. Looks like it misses a check there because parent
> is the top node.
>
> > > What's steps to reproduce this?
> >
> > The steps is the kernel config provided (proc.config) and I double checked 
> > the attached C code from the qemu image (attached here). If the kernel does 
> > not immediately crash, a ^C will cause the fault to be noticed. The report 
> > from earlier is the report from the same code, my assumption was that the 
> > possible pool/redzone corruption is making it a bit tricky to pin down.
> > If you would like alternative kernel settings please let me know, I can do 
> > that, also, my current test-bench has about 256 core's on x64, 64 of them 
> > are bare metal and 32 are arm64. Any possible preferred configuration 
> > tweaks I'm all ears, I'll be including some of these steps you suggested to 
> > me in any/additional upcoming threads (Thank you for that so far and future 
> > suggestions).
> > Also, there is some occasionally varying stacks depending on the 
> > corruption, so this stack just now (another execution of test3.c);
>
> I am unable to reproduce any of those here. What's is the output of
> /proc/cmdline in your guest when this happens?

console=ttyS0 root=/dev/sda debug earlyprintk=serial slub_debug=QUZ

Reply via email to