On 16/01/2019 16:02, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 09:25:12AM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote: >> >> On 15/01/2019 16:35, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.94 release. >>> There are 27 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>> let me know. >>> >>> Responses should be made by Thu Jan 17 15:48:28 UTC 2019. >>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>> >>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >>> >>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.14.94-rc1.gz >>> or in the git tree and branch at: >>> >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git >>> linux-4.14.y >>> and the diffstat can be found below. >>> >>> thanks, >>> >>> greg k-h >> All tests are passing for Tegra ... >> >> Test results for stable-v4.14: >> 8 builds: 8 pass, 0 fail >> 16 boots: 16 pass, 0 fail >> 14 tests: 14 pass, 0 fail >> >> Linux version: 4.14.94-rc1-gec31b1a >> Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra20-ventana, >> tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra30-cardhu-a04 > > Thanks for testing two of these. > > How about 4.19 and 4.20? Does modern kernels work on this hardware as > well? :)
We are not that advanced yet ;-) Only joking, absolutely and in fact we have more devices/boards supported in newer kernels so it would make sense. We are also testing mainline and -next. Unfortunately, it is a bit of a process to add new branches at the moment simply because we are piggy backing on existing infrastructure for testing that I personally do not own and so it needs to be approved. However, nonetheless it is doable. We were talking about adding v4.19 and then v4.20 popped up. I am not sure if you have any ideas yet about the EOL for v4.20? I was just wondering if we should prioritise v4.20 now over v4.19? Cheers Jon -- nvpublic
