On 30-01-19, 11:07, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 05:05:02PM +0000, Quentin Perret wrote: > > +static int __maybe_unused _get_cpu_power(unsigned long *mW, unsigned long > > *kHz, > > + int cpu) > > why __maybe_unused?
Yeah, it isn't required I think. He probably added it for the case where CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL=n, but even then an inline routine is defined which will accept it as argument and wouldn't do anything with it. Had it been a macro, we would have required __maybe_unused but not now. -- viresh
