Thanks for the reviews so far.

During some more testing I stumbled upon another issue:

On 07.02.2019 10:48, Stefan Agner wrote:
> Use unified assembler syntax (UAL) in inline assembler. Divided
> syntax is considered depricated. This will also allow to build
> the kernel using LLVM's integrated assembler.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mm/copypage-v4mc.c | 2 +-
>  arch/arm/mm/copypage-v4wb.c | 2 +-
>  arch/arm/mm/copypage-v4wt.c | 2 +-
>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/copypage-v4mc.c b/arch/arm/mm/copypage-v4mc.c
> index b03202cddddb..b19c7ad1a6de 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/copypage-v4mc.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/copypage-v4mc.c
> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static void mc_copy_user_page(void *from, void *to)
>       ldmia   %0!, {r2, r3, ip, lr}           @ 4\n\
>       subs    %2, %2, #1                      @ 1\n\
>       stmia   %1!, {r2, r3, ip, lr}           @ 4\n\
> -     ldmneia %0!, {r2, r3, ip, lr}           @ 4\n\
> +     ldmiane %0!, {r2, r3, ip, lr}           @ 4\n\
>       bne     1b                              @ "
>       : "+&r" (from), "+&r" (to), "=&r" (tmp)
>       : "2" (PAGE_SIZE / 64)
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/copypage-v4wb.c b/arch/arm/mm/copypage-v4wb.c
> index cd3e165afeed..6e3c9b69dd25 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/copypage-v4wb.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/copypage-v4wb.c
> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static void v4wb_copy_user_page(void *kto, const void 
> *kfrom)
>       ldmia   %1!, {r3, r4, ip, lr}           @ 4\n\
>       subs    %2, %2, #1                      @ 1\n\
>       stmia   %0!, {r3, r4, ip, lr}           @ 4\n\
> -     ldmneia %1!, {r3, r4, ip, lr}           @ 4\n\
> +     ldmiane %1!, {r3, r4, ip, lr}           @ 4\n\
>       bne     1b                              @ 1\n\
>       mcr     p15, 0, %1, c7, c10, 4          @ 1   drain WB"
>       : "+&r" (kto), "+&r" (kfrom), "=&r" (tmp)
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/copypage-v4wt.c b/arch/arm/mm/copypage-v4wt.c
> index 8614572e1296..4a40fa1cbc2a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/copypage-v4wt.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/copypage-v4wt.c
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ static void v4wt_copy_user_page(void *kto, const void 
> *kfrom)
>       ldmia   %1!, {r3, r4, ip, lr}           @ 4\n\
>       subs    %2, %2, #1                      @ 1\n\
>       stmia   %0!, {r3, r4, ip, lr}           @ 4\n\
> -     ldmneia %1!, {r3, r4, ip, lr}           @ 4\n\
> +     ldmiane %1!, {r3, r4, ip, lr}           @ 4\n\
>       bne     1b                              @ 1\n\
>       mcr     p15, 0, %2, c7, c7, 0           @ flush ID cache"
>       : "+&r" (kto), "+&r" (kfrom), "=&r" (tmp)

When compiling with gcc, this leads to:

/tmp/ccrvA1wy.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccrvA1wy.s:180: Error: bad instruction `ldmiane r0!,{r3,r4,ip,lr}'
make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:277: arch/arm/mm/copypage-v4wb.o]
Error 1
make: *** [Makefile:1042: arch/arm/mm] Error 2

Unfortunately, the gcc option -masm-syntax-unified which allows unified
syntax in inline assembly is broken (see also
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/1/7/1320).

So this requires to sprinkle those inline assembly with ".syntax
unified" strings, similar to how I've done it in uaccess.h.

--
Stefan

Reply via email to