On 12/02/19 1:41 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 11/02/19 3:23 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
>> The SDHCI core is now properly checking for the state of a WP GPIO,
>> so there is no longer any need for the sdhci-omap code to implement
>> ->get_ro() using mmc_gpio_get_ro().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazz...@bootlin.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <tred...@nvidia.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hun...@intel.com>

Acked-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kis...@ti.com>
> 
>> ---
>> Changes since v1:
>> - Added Reviewed-by from Thierry Reding
>> - Fix typo in commit log s/know/now/ noticed by Thierry Reding
>>
>> Note: this patch has only been compiled tested, as I don't have the
>> hardware to test it.
>> ---
>>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-omap.c | 1 -
>>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-omap.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-omap.c
>> index d264391616f9..c2a28930086f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-omap.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-omap.c
>> @@ -987,7 +987,6 @@ static int sdhci_omap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>              goto err_put_sync;
>>      }
>>  
>> -    host->mmc_host_ops.get_ro = mmc_gpio_get_ro;
>>      host->mmc_host_ops.start_signal_voltage_switch =
>>                                      sdhci_omap_start_signal_voltage_switch;
>>      host->mmc_host_ops.set_ios = sdhci_omap_set_ios;
>>
> 

Reply via email to