On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 03:10:12AM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
> Currently, we set hwcap based on first valid hart from DT. This may not
> be correct always as that hart might not be current booting cpu or may
> have a different capability.
> 
> Set hwcap as the capabilities supported by all possible harts with "okay"
> status.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index e7a4701f..a1e4fb34 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>  #include <linux/of.h>
>  #include <asm/processor.h>
>  #include <asm/hwcap.h>
> +#include <asm/smp.h>
>  
>  unsigned long elf_hwcap __read_mostly;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_FPU
> @@ -42,28 +43,30 @@ void riscv_fill_hwcap(void)
>  
>       elf_hwcap = 0;
>  
> -     /*
> -      * We don't support running Linux on hertergenous ISA systems.  For
> -      * now, we just check the ISA of the first "okay" processor.
> -      */
>       for_each_of_cpu_node(node) {
> -             if (riscv_of_processor_hartid(node) >= 0)
> -                     break;
> -     }
> -     if (!node) {
> -             pr_warn("Unable to find \"cpu\" devicetree entry\n");
> -             return;
> -     }
> +             unsigned long this_hwcap = 0;
>  
> -     if (of_property_read_string(node, "riscv,isa", &isa)) {
> -             pr_warn("Unable to find \"riscv,isa\" devicetree entry\n");
> -             of_node_put(node);
> -             return;
> -     }
> -     of_node_put(node);
> +             if (riscv_of_processor_hartid(node) < 0)
> +                     continue;
>  
> -     for (i = 0; i < strlen(isa); ++i)
> -             elf_hwcap |= isa2hwcap[(unsigned char)(isa[i])];
> +             if (of_property_read_string(node, "riscv,isa", &isa)) {
> +                     pr_warn("Unable to find \"riscv,isa\" devicetree 
> entry\n");
> +                     return;

Did you want "continue" here to continue processing the other harts?

Note that you currently leak the device node when returning.

Johan

Reply via email to