On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 11:25:21AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > Thanks Will. > > > > While I agree that going OOM early is a problem and would explain why > > the boosting logic was hit at all, it's still the case that the boosting > > should not divide by zero. Even if the booting is broken due to a lack > > of memory, I'd still not prefer to crash due to 1c30844d2dfe272d58c. > > Yup, sorry, our previous mails crossed paths. Your patch looks sensible in > its own right, I'm just left wondering why we're OOM so early during boot! >
I completely agree that it's worth pinning down both issues. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs
