as you are already in a tasklet, it is unnecessary to call spin_lock_bh, because softirq already disable BH.
Signed-off-by: Zhiwei Jiang <[email protected]> --- drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c index cc9cae469c4b..29e7c51fcc4b 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c @@ -3346,7 +3346,7 @@ static void ibmvscsis_handle_crq(unsigned long data) bool ack = true; volatile u8 valid; - spin_lock_bh(&vscsi->intr_lock); + spin_lock(&vscsi->intr_lock); dev_dbg(&vscsi->dev, "got interrupt\n"); @@ -3360,7 +3360,7 @@ static void ibmvscsis_handle_crq(unsigned long data) dev_dbg(&vscsi->dev, "handle_crq, don't process: flags 0x%x, state 0x%hx\n", vscsi->flags, vscsi->state); - spin_unlock_bh(&vscsi->intr_lock); + spin_unlock(&vscsi->intr_lock); return; } @@ -3437,7 +3437,7 @@ static void ibmvscsis_handle_crq(unsigned long data) (int)list_empty(&vscsi->schedule_q), vscsi->flags, vscsi->state); - spin_unlock_bh(&vscsi->intr_lock); + spin_unlock(&vscsi->intr_lock); } static int ibmvscsis_probe(struct vio_dev *vdev, -- 2.19.0
