On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 08:56:04AM +0800, Yang Shi wrote: > Since PSI has implemented some kind of measure of memory pressure, the > statement about lack of such measure is not true anymore. > > Cc: Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org> > Cc: Johannes Weiner <han...@cmpxchg.org> > Cc: Jonathan Corbet <cor...@lwn.net> > Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang....@linux.alibaba.com> > --- > Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst > b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst > index 7bf3f12..9a92013 100644 > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst > @@ -1310,8 +1310,7 @@ network to a file can use all available memory but can > also operate as > performant with a small amount of memory. A measure of memory > pressure - how much the workload is being impacted due to lack of > memory - is necessary to determine whether a workload needs more > -memory; unfortunately, memory pressure monitoring mechanism isn't > -implemented yet. > +memory.
Maybe refer to PSI? Thanks. -- tejun
