In order to perform softirq vector-finegrained locking validation we'll
need to be able to check multiple vector usages at once. Prepare the low
level usage mask check functions for that purpose.

Reviewed-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Pavan Kondeti <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul E . McKenney <[email protected]>
Cc: David S . Miller <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index a989a3e9ead7..11db7ba29660 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -1335,9 +1335,9 @@ check_redundant(struct lock_list *root, struct lock_class 
*target,
  * without creating any illegal irq-safe -> irq-unsafe lock dependency.
  */
 
-static inline int usage_match(struct lock_list *entry, void *bit)
+static inline int usage_match(struct lock_list *entry, void *mask)
 {
-       return entry->class->usage_mask & (1 << (enum lock_usage_bit)bit);
+       return entry->class->usage_mask & *(unsigned long *)mask;
 }
 
 
@@ -1353,14 +1353,14 @@ static inline int usage_match(struct lock_list *entry, 
void *bit)
  * Return <0 on error.
  */
 static int
-find_usage_forwards(struct lock_list *root, enum lock_usage_bit bit,
+find_usage_forwards(struct lock_list *root, unsigned long usage_mask,
                        struct lock_list **target_entry)
 {
        int result;
 
        debug_atomic_inc(nr_find_usage_forwards_checks);
 
-       result = __bfs_forwards(root, (void *)bit, usage_match, target_entry);
+       result = __bfs_forwards(root, &usage_mask, usage_match, target_entry);
 
        return result;
 }
@@ -1376,14 +1376,14 @@ find_usage_forwards(struct lock_list *root, enum 
lock_usage_bit bit,
  * Return <0 on error.
  */
 static int
-find_usage_backwards(struct lock_list *root, enum lock_usage_bit bit,
+find_usage_backwards(struct lock_list *root, unsigned long usage_mask,
                        struct lock_list **target_entry)
 {
        int result;
 
        debug_atomic_inc(nr_find_usage_backwards_checks);
 
-       result = __bfs_backwards(root, (void *)bit, usage_match, target_entry);
+       result = __bfs_backwards(root, &usage_mask, usage_match, target_entry);
 
        return result;
 }
@@ -1588,7 +1588,7 @@ check_usage(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock 
*prev,
        this.parent = NULL;
 
        this.class = hlock_class(prev);
-       ret = find_usage_backwards(&this, bit_backwards, &target_entry);
+       ret = find_usage_backwards(&this, BIT(bit_backwards), &target_entry);
        if (ret < 0)
                return print_bfs_bug(ret);
        if (ret == 1)
@@ -1596,7 +1596,7 @@ check_usage(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock 
*prev,
 
        that.parent = NULL;
        that.class = hlock_class(next);
-       ret = find_usage_forwards(&that, bit_forwards, &target_entry1);
+       ret = find_usage_forwards(&that, BIT(bit_forwards), &target_entry1);
        if (ret < 0)
                return print_bfs_bug(ret);
        if (ret == 1)
@@ -2555,7 +2555,7 @@ print_irq_inversion_bug(struct task_struct *curr,
  */
 static int
 check_usage_forwards(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
-                    enum lock_usage_bit bit, const char *irqclass)
+                    unsigned long usage_mask, const char *irqclass)
 {
        int ret;
        struct lock_list root;
@@ -2563,7 +2563,7 @@ check_usage_forwards(struct task_struct *curr, struct 
held_lock *this,
 
        root.parent = NULL;
        root.class = hlock_class(this);
-       ret = find_usage_forwards(&root, bit, &target_entry);
+       ret = find_usage_forwards(&root, usage_mask, &target_entry);
        if (ret < 0)
                return print_bfs_bug(ret);
        if (ret == 1)
@@ -2579,7 +2579,7 @@ check_usage_forwards(struct task_struct *curr, struct 
held_lock *this,
  */
 static int
 check_usage_backwards(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
-                     enum lock_usage_bit bit, const char *irqclass)
+                     unsigned long usage_mask, const char *irqclass)
 {
        int ret;
        struct lock_list root;
@@ -2587,7 +2587,7 @@ check_usage_backwards(struct task_struct *curr, struct 
held_lock *this,
 
        root.parent = NULL;
        root.class = hlock_class(this);
-       ret = find_usage_backwards(&root, bit, &target_entry);
+       ret = find_usage_backwards(&root, usage_mask, &target_entry);
        if (ret < 0)
                return print_bfs_bug(ret);
        if (ret == 1)
@@ -2646,7 +2646,7 @@ static inline int state_verbose(enum lock_usage_bit bit,
 }
 
 typedef int (*check_usage_f)(struct task_struct *, struct held_lock *,
-                            enum lock_usage_bit bit, const char *name);
+                            unsigned long usage_mask, const char *name);
 
 static int
 mark_lock_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
@@ -2678,7 +2678,7 @@ mark_lock_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock 
*this,
         * states.
         */
        if ((!read || !dir || STRICT_READ_CHECKS) &&
-                       !usage(curr, this, excl_bit, state_name(new_bit & 
~LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK)))
+           !usage(curr, this, BIT(excl_bit), state_name(new_bit & 
~LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK)))
                return 0;
 
        /*
@@ -2689,7 +2689,7 @@ mark_lock_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock 
*this,
                        return 0;
 
                if (STRICT_READ_CHECKS &&
-                       !usage(curr, this, excl_bit + LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK,
+                   !usage(curr, this, BIT(excl_bit + LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK),
                                state_name(new_bit + LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK)))
                        return 0;
        }
-- 
2.21.0

Reply via email to