mark_lock_irq() is going to deal with lock usages that gather multiple
softirq vectors at once. Therefore the validation through
check_usage_backwards() and check_usage_forwards() will need to handle
expanded usage masks.

So enhance those functions to that purpose.

Reviewed-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Pavan Kondeti <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul E . McKenney <[email protected]>
Cc: David S . Miller <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 2321b5e16cdf..d1bfe5eff708 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -2662,9 +2662,12 @@ print_irq_inversion_bug(struct task_struct *curr,
  */
 static int
 check_usage_forwards(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
-                    u64 usage_mask, const char *irqclass)
+                    u64 usage_mask, bool read)
 {
        int ret;
+       u64 intersec;
+       int intersec_bit;
+       const char *irqclass;
        struct lock_list root;
        struct lock_list *uninitialized_var(target_entry);
 
@@ -2676,8 +2679,14 @@ check_usage_forwards(struct task_struct *curr, struct 
held_lock *this,
        if (ret == 1)
                return ret;
 
+       intersec = usage_mask & target_entry->class->usage_mask;
+       intersec_bit = __ffs64(intersec);
+       if (read)
+               intersec_bit += LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK;
+       irqclass = state_name(intersec_bit);
+
        return print_irq_inversion_bug(curr, &root, target_entry,
-                                       this, 1, irqclass);
+                                      this, 1, irqclass);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -2686,9 +2695,12 @@ check_usage_forwards(struct task_struct *curr, struct 
held_lock *this,
  */
 static int
 check_usage_backwards(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
-                     u64 usage_mask, const char *irqclass)
+                     u64 usage_mask, bool read)
 {
        int ret;
+       u64 intersec;
+       int intersec_bit;
+       const char *irqclass;
        struct lock_list root;
        struct lock_list *uninitialized_var(target_entry);
 
@@ -2700,6 +2712,12 @@ check_usage_backwards(struct task_struct *curr, struct 
held_lock *this,
        if (ret == 1)
                return ret;
 
+       intersec = usage_mask & target_entry->class->usage_mask;
+       intersec_bit = __ffs64(intersec);
+       if (read)
+               intersec_bit += LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK;
+       irqclass = state_name(intersec_bit);
+
        return print_irq_inversion_bug(curr, &root, target_entry,
                                        this, 0, irqclass);
 }
@@ -2753,7 +2771,7 @@ static inline int state_verbose(enum lock_usage_bit bit,
 }
 
 typedef int (*check_usage_f)(struct task_struct *, struct held_lock *,
-                            u64 usage_mask, const char *name);
+                            u64 usage_mask, bool read);
 
 static int
 mark_lock_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
@@ -2789,7 +2807,7 @@ mark_lock_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock 
*this,
         * states.
         */
        if ((!read || !dir || STRICT_READ_CHECKS) &&
-           !usage(curr, this, lock_usage_mask(&excl_usage), 
state_name(new_usage->bit & ~LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK)))
+           !usage(curr, this, lock_usage_mask(&excl_usage), false))
                return 0;
 
        /*
@@ -2803,7 +2821,7 @@ mark_lock_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock 
*this,
 
                if (STRICT_READ_CHECKS &&
                    !usage(curr, this, lock_usage_mask(&excl_usage),
-                          state_name(new_usage->bit + LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK)))
+                              true))
                        return 0;
        }
 
-- 
2.21.0

Reply via email to