Nobody like this patch? :)

In my test, for a 72MB perf.data (with LBR data), the perf annotate processing speed:

Before: 10.2s
After: 2.2s

Thanks
Jin Yao

On 3/16/2019 5:16 AM, Jin Yao wrote:
The hist__account_cycles is executed when the hist_iter__branch_callback
is called. But it looks it's not necessary. In hist__account_cycles, it
already walks on all branch entries.

This patch moves the hist__account_cycles out of callback, now the data
processing is much faster than before.

Previous code has an issue that the ch[offset].num++
(in __symbol__account_cycles) is executed repeatedly since
hist__account_cycles is called in each hist_iter__branch_callback,
so the counting of ch[offset].num is not correct (too big).
With this patch, the issue is fixed. And we don't need the code of
"ch->reset >= ch->num / 2" to check if there are too many overlaps
(in annotation__count_and_fill), otherwise some data would be
hidden.

Now, we can try, for example:

perf record -b ...
perf annotate or perf report -s symbol

The before/after output should be no change.

  v3:
  ---
  Fix the crash in stdio mode.
  Like previous code, it needs the checking of ui__has_annotation()
  before hist__account_cycles()

  v2:
  ---
  1. Cover the similar perf report
  2. Remove the checking code "ch->reset >= ch->num / 2"

Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao....@linux.intel.com>
---
  tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c |  4 ++--
  tools/perf/builtin-report.c   | 11 +++++------
  tools/perf/util/annotate.c    |  2 +-
  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c b/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
index 67f9d9f..77deb3a 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
@@ -159,8 +159,6 @@ static int hist_iter__branch_callback(struct 
hist_entry_iter *iter,
        struct perf_evsel *evsel = iter->evsel;
        int err;
- hist__account_cycles(sample->branch_stack, al, sample, false);
-
        bi = he->branch_info;
        err = addr_map_symbol__inc_samples(&bi->from, sample, evsel);
@@ -199,6 +197,8 @@ static int process_branch_callback(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
        if (a.map != NULL)
                a.map->dso->hit = 1;
+ hist__account_cycles(sample->branch_stack, al, sample, false);
+
        ret = hist_entry_iter__add(&iter, &a, PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH, ann);
        return ret;
  }
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
index 1921aaa..493e115 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
@@ -136,9 +136,6 @@ static int hist_iter__report_callback(struct 
hist_entry_iter *iter,
        if (!ui__has_annotation() && !rep->symbol_ipc)
                return 0;
- hist__account_cycles(sample->branch_stack, al, sample,
-                            rep->nonany_branch_mode);
-
        if (sort__mode == SORT_MODE__BRANCH) {
                bi = he->branch_info;
                err = addr_map_symbol__inc_samples(&bi->from, sample, evsel);
@@ -181,9 +178,6 @@ static int hist_iter__branch_callback(struct 
hist_entry_iter *iter,
        if (!ui__has_annotation() && !rep->symbol_ipc)
                return 0;
- hist__account_cycles(sample->branch_stack, al, sample,
-                            rep->nonany_branch_mode);
-
        bi = he->branch_info;
        err = addr_map_symbol__inc_samples(&bi->from, sample, evsel);
        if (err)
@@ -282,6 +276,11 @@ static int process_sample_event(struct perf_tool *tool,
        if (al.map != NULL)
                al.map->dso->hit = 1;
+ if (ui__has_annotation() || rep->symbol_ipc) {
+               hist__account_cycles(sample->branch_stack, &al, sample,
+                                    rep->nonany_branch_mode);
+       }
+
        ret = hist_entry_iter__add(&iter, &al, rep->max_stack, rep);
        if (ret < 0)
                pr_debug("problem adding hist entry, skipping event\n");
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
index 5f6dbbf..e8080c0 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
@@ -1015,7 +1015,7 @@ static void annotation__count_and_fill(struct annotation 
*notes, u64 start, u64
                float ipc = n_insn / ((double)ch->cycles / (double)ch->num);
/* Hide data when there are too many overlaps. */
-               if (ch->reset >= 0x7fff || ch->reset >= ch->num / 2)
+               if (ch->reset >= 0x7fff)
                        return;
for (offset = start; offset <= end; offset++) {

Reply via email to