Add an explanation why zero width check is needed when generating factor
mask using GENMASK() macro.

Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkmp.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkmp.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkmp.c
index 69dfc6de1c4e..cbcdf664f336 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkmp.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkmp.c
@@ -186,6 +186,12 @@ static int ccu_nkmp_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned 
long rate,
 
        ccu_nkmp_find_best(parent_rate, rate, &_nkmp);
 
+       /*
+        * If width is 0, GENMASK() macro may not generate expected mask (0)
+        * as it falls under undefined behaviour by C standard due to shifts
+        * which are equal or greater than width of left operand. This can
+        * be easily avoided by explicitly checking if width is 0.
+        */
        if (nkmp->n.width)
                n_mask = GENMASK(nkmp->n.width + nkmp->n.shift - 1,
                                 nkmp->n.shift);
-- 
2.21.0

Reply via email to