On 04/12/19 at 02:55pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> kernel_randomize_memory() uses __PHYSICAL_MASK_SHIFT to calculate
> the maximum amount of system RAM supported. The size of the direct
> mapping section is obtained from the smaller one of the below two
> values:
> 
>  (actual system RAM size + padding size) vs (max system RAM size supported)
> 
> This calculation is wrong since commit:
> b83ce5ee91471d ("x86/mm/64: Make __PHYSICAL_MASK_SHIFT always 52").
> 
> In commit b83ce5ee91471d, __PHYSICAL_MASK_SHIFT was changed to be 52,
> regardless of whether it's using 4-level or 5-level page tables.
> It will always use 4 PB as the maximum amount of system RAM, even
> in 4-level paging mode where it should be 64 TB.  Thus the size of
> the direct mapping section will always be the sum of the actual
> system RAM size plus the padding size.
> 
> Even when the amount of system RAM is 64 TB, the following layout will
> still be used. Obviously KALSR will be weakened significantly.
> 
>    |_______actual RAM_______|_padding_|______the rest_______ |
>    0            64TB          74TB                    ~120TB
                                ~~ I could use tab, will resend to
correct this.
> 
> What we want is the following:
> 
>    |_______actual RAM_______|_________the rest_______________|
>    0            64TB                                  ~120TB
> 
> So the code should use MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS instead. Fix it by replacing
> __PHYSICAL_MASK_SHIFT with MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS.
> 
> Fixes: b83ce5ee9147 ("x86/mm/64: Make __PHYSICAL_MASK_SHIFT always 52")
> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shute...@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Garnier <thgar...@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <b...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/mm/kaslr.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/kaslr.c b/arch/x86/mm/kaslr.c
> index 9a8756517504..387d4ed25d7c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/kaslr.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/kaslr.c
> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ void __init kernel_randomize_memory(void)
>       if (!kaslr_memory_enabled())
>               return;
>  
> -     kaslr_regions[0].size_tb = 1 << (__PHYSICAL_MASK_SHIFT - TB_SHIFT);
> +     kaslr_regions[0].size_tb = 1 << (MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS - TB_SHIFT);
>       kaslr_regions[1].size_tb = VMALLOC_SIZE_TB;
>  
>       /*
> -- 
> 2.17.2
> 

Reply via email to