Will Deacon <[email protected]> wrote: > - unsigned long, fd, off_t, off) > + unsigned long, fd, off_t, pgoff) > { > + unsigned long off = pgoff; > +
Would loff_t be better? David
Will Deacon <[email protected]> wrote: > - unsigned long, fd, off_t, off) > + unsigned long, fd, off_t, pgoff) > { > + unsigned long off = pgoff; > +
Would loff_t be better? David