None of these is used in modular code, and we should probably try to keep it that way. They can be added back if we really get a legitimate modular user.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> --- FYI: this was inspired by the fact the s390 copied some of the exports, which made me wonder why they added them. I could not find any potential users either in their patchkit nor in mainline. arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c | 2 -- arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c | 2 -- 2 files changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c index 385afa2b9e17..031e7702bd1e 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c @@ -339,13 +339,11 @@ bool sme_active(void) { return sme_me_mask && !sev_enabled; } -EXPORT_SYMBOL(sme_active); bool sev_active(void) { return sme_me_mask && sev_enabled; } -EXPORT_SYMBOL(sev_active); /* Architecture __weak replacement functions */ void __init mem_encrypt_free_decrypted_mem(void) diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c index 4c570612e24e..9d83c724293a 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c @@ -2066,13 +2066,11 @@ int set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages) { return __set_memory_enc_dec(addr, numpages, true); } -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(set_memory_encrypted); int set_memory_decrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages) { return __set_memory_enc_dec(addr, numpages, false); } -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(set_memory_decrypted); int set_pages_uc(struct page *page, int numpages) { -- 2.20.1
