I worked with low-jitter on Linux, here earlier, and tested Available Source, 
and found it to be of high quality, giving 172/3 frames with the jitter 
sensitive 3-pass Doom 3 engine, from ID Software,then at 1080p res, some years 
ago, a good test for the fastest bus in the system, and giving a good general 
idea of potential system performance.

The Available Source Unix derivative Linux, turned out better than Microsoft 
Windows, that ofcourse without working priorities, one needs to turn off tasks 
instead, and even with this, needed double CPU speed for similar performance.

As for multiple cpus, understanding low jitter as the time it takes to do the 
inner loop, one cpu seems enough for most, with todays speeds of 4GHZ. More 
becomes a bit of a luxury on desktops but could be used for parallel threads 
ofcourse. While phones will use minimal power technology, and big servers 
many-cpus for serving the masses.

I also happened to see discussions in GNU space where "GNU has failed, it is 
not happened on the desktop". But indeed BSD has, with OSX. So it is not 
anything like that Available Source in general has failed, but indeed seems to 
be of higher quality than closed alternatives, and the netbased discussions of 
much faster dynamics, than regular phonesupport indeed.

Furthermore it seems Available Source is general seems to grow, and a 
one-system topology seems viable, but it needs to fuse with existing commercial 
principles, and workunion principles of Fair Labour, that indeed is established 
by law, and thus should also be part of the inner loop, of a low-jitter system, 
then probably a BSD Unix derivative.

This research was part of a greater research project on monotheism, that also 
addresses the behaviour problems we see online, and further concludes that a 
zén-concept of the divine, that works in our culture, and a Quranic upgrade to 
the Bible is neccesary, perfecting the Abrahamic background of a computer 
system.

And indeed the internet is already much a technocracy, where relevance is 
filtered in specialist workgroups, with leaders taking this to mainleader, just 
as information needs to be handled to be handlable in a system aswell. Where 
one indeed needs results, and irrelevance goes out, being even more democratic 
than democracy.

So optimal information handling is low-jitter is technocratic, and an optimal 
OS, and I suggest this being Oase aswell.

Peace Go With Thee.
Ywe Cærlyn,
Oase Initiative Taker.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCR3gmLVjHS5A702wo4bol_Q

Reply via email to