On 31-May 08:35, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Patrick.
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 10:44:55AM +0100, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
[...]
> For proportions (as opposed to weights), we use percentage rational
> numbers - e.g. 38.44 for 38.44%. I have parser and doc update commits
> pending. I'll put them on cgroup/for-5.3.
That's a point worth discussing with Peter, we already changed one
time from percentages to 1024 scale.
Utilization clamps are expressed as percentages by definition,
they are just expressed in a convenient 1024 scale which should not be
alien to people using those knobs.
If we wanna use a "more specific" name like uclamp.{min,max} then we
should probably also accept to use a "more specific" metric, don't we?
I personally like the [0..1024] range, but I guess that's really up to
you and Peter to agree upon.
> Thanks.
>
> --
> tejun
Cheers,
Patrick
--
#include <best/regards.h>
Patrick Bellasi
