Commit-ID:  4609c4f963f353613812f999bb027aac795bcde8
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/4609c4f963f353613812f999bb027aac795bcde8
Author:     Yuyang Du <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Mon, 6 May 2019 16:19:33 +0800
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
CommitDate: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 11:55:49 +0200

locking/lockdep: Remove redundant argument in check_deadlock

In check_deadlock(), the third argument read comes from the second
argument hlock so that it can be removed. No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index b2ca20aa69aa..be4c1348ddcd 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -2246,7 +2246,7 @@ print_deadlock_bug(struct task_struct *curr, struct 
held_lock *prev,
  * Returns: 0 on deadlock detected, 1 on OK, 2 on recursive read
  */
 static int
-check_deadlock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next, int read)
+check_deadlock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next)
 {
        struct held_lock *prev;
        struct held_lock *nest = NULL;
@@ -2265,7 +2265,7 @@ check_deadlock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock 
*next, int read)
                 * Allow read-after-read recursion of the same
                 * lock class (i.e. read_lock(lock)+read_lock(lock)):
                 */
-               if ((read == 2) && prev->read)
+               if ((next->read == 2) && prev->read)
                        return 2;
 
                /*
@@ -2839,7 +2839,7 @@ static int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr,
                 * The simple case: does the current hold the same lock
                 * already?
                 */
-               int ret = check_deadlock(curr, hlock, hlock->read);
+               int ret = check_deadlock(curr, hlock);
 
                if (!ret)
                        return 0;

Reply via email to