On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 03:07:58PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Currently pt_regs on x86_32 has an oddity in that kernel regs
> (!user_mode(regs)) are short two entries (esp/ss). This means that any
> code trying to use them (typically: regs->sp) needs to jump through
> some unfortunate hoops.
> 
> Change the entry code to fix this up and create a full pt_regs frame.
> 
> This then simplifies various trampolines in ftrace and kprobes, the
> stack unwinder, ptrace, kdump and kgdb.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
>
> ---
>  arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S         |  105 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h      |   17 ------
>  arch/x86/include/asm/ptrace.h     |   17 ------
>  arch/x86/include/asm/stacktrace.h |    2 
>  arch/x86/kernel/crash.c           |    8 --
>  arch/x86/kernel/ftrace_32.S       |   77 +++++++++++++++------------
>  arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c            |    8 --
>  arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/common.h  |    4 -
>  arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c    |   29 ++++------
>  arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/opt.c     |   20 ++++---
>  arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c      |   16 +----
>  arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c          |   29 ----------
>  arch/x86/kernel/time.c            |    3 -
>  arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c    |   32 +----------
>  arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c      |    2 
>  15 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 191 deletions(-)

I recall writing some of this code (some of the kernel_stack_pointer
removal stuff) so please give me a shout-out ;-)

Otherwise:

Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>

-- 
Josh

Reply via email to