On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 05:18:56PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 05:15:31PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the > > return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should > > never do something different based on this. > > > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> > > Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> > > Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> > > Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]> > > Cc: <[email protected]> > > Cc: Tony Luck <[email protected]> > > Cc: Vishal Verma <[email protected]> > > Cc: Pu Wen <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> > > --- > > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c | 16 +++++--------- > > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/inject.c | 34 +++++------------------------- > > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/severity.c | 14 +++--------- > > 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-) > > I think I'm having a deja-vu: > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Ah, I thought I had sent this out before... Anyway, I'll fix this up, but really, you will not have a debugfs file fail creation unless the system is totally out of memory... thanks, greg k-h
