On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 03:04:54PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup() is marked __init, but its caller is not, so
> we get a warning with clang-8:
> 
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x343c8): Section mismatch in reference from the 
> function omap3xxx_prm_late_init() to the function 
> .init.text:omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup()
> The function omap3xxx_prm_late_init() references
> the function __init omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup().
> This is often because omap3xxx_prm_late_init lacks a __init
> annotation or the annotation of omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup is wrong.
> 

That's unfortunate, both omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup and
omap3xxx_prm_late_init are only ever called at init time (by prm_late_init
which is also __init annotated). However the omap3xxx_prm_ll_data
structure containing the late_init has a life beyond init. Otherwise I
would have suggested annotating omap3xxx_prm_late_init.

Reviewed-by: Andrew Murray <[email protected]>

> When building with gcc, omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup() is always
> inlined, so we never noticed in the past.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
> index 05858f966f7d..dfa65fc2c82b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
> @@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ static void omap3_prm_reconfigure_io_chain(void)
>   * registers, and omap3xxx_prm_reconfigure_io_chain() must be called.
>   * No return value.
>   */
> -static void __init omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup(void)
> +static void omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup(void)
>  {
>       if (prm_features & PRM_HAS_IO_WAKEUP)
>               omap2_prm_set_mod_reg_bits(OMAP3430_EN_IO_MASK, WKUP_MOD,
> -- 
> 2.20.0
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Reply via email to