On Thu 11-07-19 10:56:52, Steve Magnani wrote:
> On 7/11/19 10:04 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Thanks for the patches! I've added them to my tree and somewhat simplified
> > the logic since we don't really care about nsr 2 vs 3 or whether we
> > actually saw BEA or not. Everything seems to work fine for me but I'd
> > appreciate if you could doublecheck - the result is pushed out to
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jack/linux-fs.git for_next
> >
> Tested-by: Steven J. Magnani <st...@digidescorp.com>
>
> The rework is more permissive than what you had suggested initially
> (conditioning acceptance of a noncompliant NSR on a preceding BEA).
> I had also tried to code the original so that a malformed 2048-byte
> interval VRS would not be accepted. But the simplifications do make
> the code easier to follow...
Yeah, it's simpler to follow and we do this check just to see whether this
may be a valid UDF media before doing more expensive probing. So I don't
think that the code being more permissive matters. Thanks for testing!
Honza
--
Jan Kara <j...@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
