On Sat, 27 Jul 2019, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Jul 2019, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > 
> > I think it's getting quite late to start inventing new seccomp
> > features to fix this.  I think the right solution for 5.3 is to change
> > the 32-bit vdso fallback to use the old clock_gettime, i.e.
> > clock_gettime32.  This is obviously not an acceptable long-term
> > solution.
> 
> Sigh. I'll have a look....

Completely untested patch below.

For the record: I have to say that I hate it.

Just to be clear. Once a clever seccomp admin decides to enforce Y2038
compliance by filtering out the legacy syscalls this will force glibc into
the syscall slowpath directly because __vdso_clock_gettime64() is gone.

So this needs a proper secccomp solution soener than later.

The fallback change to the legacy syscall is on purpose conditional on
CONFIG_SECCOMP so those people who care can get access to
__vdso_clock_gettime64() nevertheless. 

Thanks,

        tglx

8<-----------------
--- a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32/vdso32.lds.S
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32/vdso32.lds.S
@@ -27,7 +27,9 @@ VERSION
                __vdso_gettimeofday;
                __vdso_time;
                __vdso_clock_getres;
+#ifndef CONFIG_SECCOMP
                __vdso_clock_gettime64;
+#endif
        };
 
        LINUX_2.5 {
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h
@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ long clock_gettime_fallback(clockid_t _c
 {
        long ret;
 
+#ifndef CONFIG_SECCOMP
        asm (
                "mov %%ebx, %%edx \n"
                "mov %[clock], %%ebx \n"
@@ -110,6 +111,36 @@ long clock_gettime_fallback(clockid_t _c
                : "0" (__NR_clock_gettime64), [clock] "g" (_clkid), "c" (_ts)
                : "edx");
 
+#else
+       struct old_timespec32 tmpts;
+
+       /*
+        * Using clock_gettime and not clock_gettime64 here is a
+        * temporary workaround to pacify seccomp filters which are
+        * unaware of the Y2038 safe variant.
+        */
+
+       asm (
+               "mov %%ebx, %%edx \n"
+               "mov %[clock], %%ebx \n"
+               "call __kernel_vsyscall \n"
+               "mov %%edx, %%ebx \n"
+               : "=a" (ret), "=m" (tmpts)
+               : "0" (__NR_clock_gettime), [clock] "g" (_clkid), "c" (&tmpts)
+               : "edx");
+
+       /*
+        * The core code will have to convert that back. A smart compiler
+        * should notice and avoid the double conversion. If not, bad luck;
+        * we we are not going to change the core code just to make seccomp
+        * happy.
+        */
+
+       if (!ret) {
+               _ts->tv_sec = tmpts.tv_sec;
+               _ts->tv_nsec = tmpts.tv_nsec;
+       }
+#endif
        return ret;
 }
 
@@ -136,6 +167,7 @@ clock_getres_fallback(clockid_t _clkid,
 {
        long ret;
 
+#ifndef CONFIG_SECCOMP
        asm (
                "mov %%ebx, %%edx \n"
                "mov %[clock], %%ebx \n"
@@ -144,7 +176,32 @@ clock_getres_fallback(clockid_t _clkid,
                : "=a" (ret), "=m" (*_ts)
                : "0" (__NR_clock_getres_time64), [clock] "g" (_clkid), "c" 
(_ts)
                : "edx");
+#else
+       struct old_timespec32 tmpts;
+
+       /*
+        * Using clock_getres and not clock_getres_time64 here is a
+        * temporary workaround to pacify seccomp filters which are unaware
+        * of the time64 variants. Technically there is no requirement to
+        * use the 64bit variant here as the resolution is definitely not
+        * affected by Y2038, but the end goal of Y2038 is to utilize the
+        * new 64bit timespec variants for everything.
+        */
+
+       asm (
+               "mov %%ebx, %%edx \n"
+               "mov %[clock], %%ebx \n"
+               "call __kernel_vsyscall \n"
+               "mov %%edx, %%ebx \n"
+               : "=a" (ret), "=m" (tmpts)
+               : "0" (__NR_clock_getres), [clock] "g" (_clkid), "c" (&tmpts)
+               : "edx");
 
+       if (!ret) {
+               _ts->tv_sec = tmpts.tv_sec;
+               _ts->tv_nsec = tmpts.tv_nsec;
+       }
+#endif
        return ret;
 }
 

Reply via email to