On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 05:14:31PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 07/23/2019 03:11 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > It might also be worth pointing out the reasons for this naming, e.g.
> > p?d_large() aren't currently generic, and this name minimizes potential
> > confusion between p?d_{large,huge}().
>
> Agreed. But these fallback also need to first check non-availability of large
> pages.
We're deliberately not making the p?d_large() helpers generic, so this
shouldn't fall back on those.
It's up to the architecture to implement these correctly, and the
architecture-specific implementations will be added in subsequent
patches.
Thanks,
Mark.
