Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warning (Building: arm):
sound/soc/ti/n810.c: In function ‘n810_ext_control’: sound/soc/ti/n810.c:48:10: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] line1l = 1; ~~~~~~~^~~ sound/soc/ti/n810.c:49:2: note: here case N810_JACK_HP: ^~~~ sound/soc/ti/rx51.c: In function ‘rx51_ext_control’: sound/soc/ti/rx51.c:57:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] hs = 1; ~~~^~~ sound/soc/ti/rx51.c:58:2: note: here case RX51_JACK_HP: ^~~~ Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]> --- sound/soc/ti/n810.c | 1 + sound/soc/ti/rx51.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/sound/soc/ti/n810.c b/sound/soc/ti/n810.c index 2c3f2a4c1700..3ad2b6daf31e 100644 --- a/sound/soc/ti/n810.c +++ b/sound/soc/ti/n810.c @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ static void n810_ext_control(struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm) switch (n810_jack_func) { case N810_JACK_HS: line1l = 1; + /* fall through */ case N810_JACK_HP: hp = 1; break; diff --git a/sound/soc/ti/rx51.c b/sound/soc/ti/rx51.c index bc6046534fa5..ccd0e8a07dd1 100644 --- a/sound/soc/ti/rx51.c +++ b/sound/soc/ti/rx51.c @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ static void rx51_ext_control(struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm) break; case RX51_JACK_HS: hs = 1; + /* fall through */ case RX51_JACK_HP: hp = 1; break; -- 2.22.0
