On Mon 29 Jul 2019 at 15:29, Stephen Boyd <[email protected]> wrote:
> Quoting Jerome Brunet (2019-07-03 05:26:14)
>> @@ -1005,8 +1087,27 @@ static int axg_audio_clkc_probe(struct
>> platform_device *pdev)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - return devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider(dev, of_clk_hw_onecell_get,
>> - data->hw_onecell_data);
>> + ret = devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider(dev, of_clk_hw_onecell_get,
>> + data->hw_onecell_data);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + /* Stop here if there is no reset */
>> + if (!data->reset_num)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + rst = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*rst), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!rst)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + rst->map = map;
>> + rst->offset = data->reset_offset;
>> + rst->rstc.nr_resets = data->reset_num;
>> + rst->rstc.ops = &axg_audio_rstc_ops;
>> + rst->rstc.of_node = dev->of_node;
>> + rst->rstc.owner = THIS_MODULE;
>> +
>> + return ret = devm_reset_controller_register(dev, &rst->rstc);
>
> IS this a typo? Just return devm instead?
Typo it is. Thanks for pointing it out.
>
>> }
>>
>> static const struct audioclk_data axg_audioclk_data = {
