Quoting Martin Blumenstingl (2019-07-02 16:28:55) > Hi Stephen, Hi Neil, > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 11:13 AM Neil Armstrong <narmstr...@baylibre.com> > wrote: > > > > In order to implement clock switching for the CLKID_CPU_CLK and > > CLKID_CPUB_CLK, notifiers are added on specific points of the > > clock tree : > > > > cpu_clk / cpub_clk > > | \- cpu_clk_dyn > > | | \- cpu_clk_premux0 > > | | |- cpu_clk_postmux0 > > | | | |- cpu_clk_dyn0_div > > | | | \- xtal/fclk_div2/fclk_div3 > > | | \- xtal/fclk_div2/fclk_div3 > > | \- cpu_clk_premux1 > > | |- cpu_clk_postmux1 > > | | |- cpu_clk_dyn1_div > > | | \- xtal/fclk_div2/fclk_div3 > > | \- xtal/fclk_div2/fclk_div3 > > \ sys_pll / sys1_pll > > > > This for each cluster, a single one for G12A, two for G12B. > > > > Each cpu_clk_premux1 tree is marked as read-only and > > CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT, > > to be used as "parking" clock in a safe clock frequency. > it seems that this is one case where the "coordinated clocks" feature > would come handy: [0] > Stephen, do you know if those patches stopped in March or if there's > still some ongoing effort to get them ready? >
Derek told me yesterday he wants to work on it again, but I don't know his timeline. If Derek doesn't reply here then maybe it can be picked up by someone else.
