On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 6:41 AM Yang Weijiang <weijiang.y...@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi, Vitaly, > After looked into the issue and others, I feel to make SPP co-existing > with nested VM is not good, the major reason is, L1 pages protected by > SPP are transparent to L1 VM, if it launches L2 VM, probably the > pages would be allocated to L2 VM, and that will bother to L1 and L2. > Given the feature is new and I don't see nested VM can benefit > from it right now, I would like to make SPP and nested feature mutually > exclusive, i.e., detecting if the other part is active before activate one > feature,what do you think of it? > thanks! How do you propose making the features mutually exclusive?
