On Sat, 2019-08-10 at 13:33 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Sat, 2019-08-10 at 13:18 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: [] > > There are classes of patches generated by scripts that have > > no real mechanism to be applied today. > > > > For instance: global coccinelle scripted changes to use stracpy > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/alpine.DEB.2.21.1907251747560.2494@hadrien/ > > > > and trivial scripted changes to MAINTAINERS > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/6482e6546dc328ec47b07dba9a78a9573ebb3e56.ca...@perches.com/ > > > > that are basically impossible to be applied by anyone but you. > > > > Otherwise there are hundreds of little micro patches most of > > which would not otherwise be applied. > > > > There should be some process available to get these treewide > > or difficult to keep up-to-date and apply patches handled. > > > > I believe these sorts of scripted patches should ideally > > be handled immediately before an RC1 so other trees can be > > synchronized in the simplest way possible. > > Hey Stephen > > Question for you about a possible -next process change. > > Would it be reasonable to have some mechanism to script > treewide patches to generate and apply after Andrew Morton's > mmotm patches are applied to -next? > > This could allow treewide scripted patches to have > compilation and test coverage before possibly being > applied to Linus' tree. > > What would be necessary to allow this?
Ping?
