Re: [PATCH 14/14] mm/lru: fix the comments of lru_lock

[Alex Shi]

在 2019/8/20 下午10:00, Matthew Wilcox 写道:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 05:48:37PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
>> @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ static inline bool free_area_empty(struct free_area 
>> *area, int migratetype)
>>  struct pglist_data;
>>  
>>  /*
>> - * zone->lock and the zone lru_lock are two of the hottest locks in the 
>> kernel.
>> + * zone->lock and the lru_lock are two of the hottest locks in the kernel.
>>   * So add a wild amount of padding here to ensure that they fall into 
>> separate
>>   * cachelines.  There are very few zone structures in the machine, so space
>>   * consumption is not a concern here.
> 
> But after this patch series, the lru lock is no longer stored in the zone.
> So this comment makes no sense.

Yes, It's need reconsider here. thanks for opoint out.

> 
>> @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ struct zone_reclaim_stat {
>>  
>>  struct lruvec {
>>      struct list_head                lists[NR_LRU_LISTS];
>> -    /* move lru_lock to per lruvec for memcg */
>> +    /* perf lruvec lru_lock for memcg */
> 
> What does the word 'perf' mean here?

sorry for typo, could be s/perf/per/ here.

Thanks
Alex