On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 11:01:44AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > These wrappers don't provide a real benefit over just using > set_memory_x and set_memory_nx. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de> > --- > arch/x86/include/asm/set_memory.h | 2 -- > arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_32.c | 4 ++-- > arch/x86/mm/init_32.c | 2 +- > arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c | 16 ---------------- > 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/set_memory.h > b/arch/x86/include/asm/set_memory.h > index 899ec9ae7cff..fd549c3ebb17 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/set_memory.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/set_memory.h > @@ -75,8 +75,6 @@ int set_pages_array_wb(struct page **pages, int > addrinarray); > > int set_pages_uc(struct page *page, int numpages); > int set_pages_wb(struct page *page, int numpages); > -int set_pages_x(struct page *page, int numpages); > -int set_pages_nx(struct page *page, int numpages); > int set_pages_ro(struct page *page, int numpages); > int set_pages_rw(struct page *page, int numpages);
$Subject and patch content don't match up. Other than that, Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org> for all x86 patches.
