On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 09:09:18PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > The comment above the function which arms RLIMIT_CPU in the posix CPU timer > code makes no sense at all. It claims that the kernel does not return an > error code when it rejected the attempt to set RLIMIT_CPU. That's clearly > bogus as the code does an error check and the rlimit is only set and > activated when the permission checks are ok. In case of a rejection an > appropriate error code is returned. > > This is a historical and outdated comment which got dragged along even when > the rlimit handling code was rewritten. > > Replace it with an explanation why the setup function is not called when > the rlimit value is RLIM_INFINITY and how the 'disarming' is handled. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> > Cc: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> > Cc: Jiri Slaby <jsl...@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frede...@kernel.org>
