On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 11:58 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <raf...@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 12:35 PM Chuanhua Han <chuanhua....@nxp.com> wrote: > > > > Enable NXP i2c controller to boot with ACPI > > > > Signed-off-by: Meenakshi Aggarwal <meenakshi.aggar...@nxp.com> > > Signed-off-by: Udit Kumar <udit.ku...@nxp.com> > > Signed-off-by: Chuanhua Han <chuanhua....@nxp.com> > > Wolfram, any objections to this from the i2c side?
May I propose amendment(s)? > > @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ > > #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> > > #include <linux/sched.h> > > #include <linux/slab.h> > > +#include <linux/acpi.h> If it's kept in order, better to go with it. (Yes, it is as I have checked) However, property.h should be included instead, see below. > > const struct of_device_id *of_id = of_match_device(i2c_imx_dt_ids, > > &pdev->dev); > > + const struct acpi_device_id *acpi_id = > > + acpi_match_device(i2c_imx_acpi_ids, > > + &pdev->dev); > > if (of_id) > > i2c_imx->hwdata = of_id->data; > > + else if (acpi_id) > > + i2c_imx->hwdata = (struct imx_i2c_hwdata *) > > + acpi_id->driver_data; The above altogher may be replaced with const struct imx_i2c_hwdata *match; ... match = device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev); if (match) i2c_imx->hwdata = match; else ... > > + .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(i2c_imx_acpi_ids), Since there is no #ifdef guard no need to use ACPI_PTR(). -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
