On 2019-09-04 08:52, Marco Felsch wrote:
Hi Robin,

thanks for the patch it looks quite good, just two minor nitpicks.

On 19-09-04 06:23, Robin van der Gracht wrote:
The first generation i.MX6 processors does not send an interrupt when the power key is pressed. It sends a power down request interrupt if the key is
released before a hard shutdown (5 second press). This should allow
software to bring down the SoC safely.

For this driver to work as a regular power key with the older SoCs, we need
to send a keypress AND release when we get the power down request irq.

Signed-off-by: Robin van der Gracht <ro...@protonic.nl>
---

Changes v2 -> v3:
- Drop alt compatible string for identifying first revision snvs hardware,
   read minor revision from register instead.
- Drop imx6qdl.dtsi modification and device-tree binding documentation. - Add an additional input_sync() to create 2 seperate input reports for press
   and release.

 drivers/input/keyboard/Kconfig       |  2 +-
drivers/input/keyboard/snvs_pwrkey.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/Kconfig b/drivers/input/keyboard/Kconfig
index 7c4f19dab34f..937e58da5ce1 100644
--- a/drivers/input/keyboard/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/Kconfig
@@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ config KEYBOARD_SNVS_PWRKEY
        depends on OF
        help
This is the snvs powerkey driver for the Freescale i.MX application
-         processors that are newer than i.MX6 SX.
+         processors.

          To compile this driver as a module, choose M here; the
          module will be called snvs_pwrkey.
diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/snvs_pwrkey.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/snvs_pwrkey.c
index 5342d8d45f81..828580eee0d2 100644
--- a/drivers/input/keyboard/snvs_pwrkey.c
+++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/snvs_pwrkey.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
 #include <linux/regmap.h>

+#define SNVS_HPVIDR1_REG 0xF8
 #define SNVS_LPSR_REG  0x4C    /* LP Status Register */
 #define SNVS_LPCR_REG  0x38    /* LP Control Register */
 #define SNVS_HPSR_REG  0x14
@@ -37,6 +38,7 @@ struct pwrkey_drv_data {
        int wakeup;
        struct timer_list check_timer;
        struct input_dev *input;
+       u8 minor_rev;
 };

 static void imx_imx_snvs_check_for_events(struct timer_list *t)
@@ -45,6 +47,20 @@ static void imx_imx_snvs_check_for_events(struct timer_list *t)
        struct input_dev *input = pdata->input;
        u32 state;

+       if (pdata->minor_rev == 0) {

Should we use a define here and ..

+               /*
+                * The first generation i.MX6 SoCs only sends an interrupt on
+                * button release. To mimic power-key usage, we'll prepend a
+                * press event.
+                */
+               input_report_key(input, pdata->keycode, 1);
+               input_sync(input);
+               input_report_key(input, pdata->keycode, 0);
+               input_sync(input);
+               pm_relax(input->dev.parent);
+               return;
+       }
+
        regmap_read(pdata->snvs, SNVS_HPSR_REG, &state);
        state = state & SNVS_HPSR_BTN ? 1 : 0;

@@ -67,13 +83,17 @@ static irqreturn_t imx_snvs_pwrkey_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 {
        struct platform_device *pdev = dev_id;
        struct pwrkey_drv_data *pdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+       unsigned long expire = jiffies;
        u32 lp_status;

        pm_wakeup_event(pdata->input->dev.parent, 0);

        regmap_read(pdata->snvs, SNVS_LPSR_REG, &lp_status);
-       if (lp_status & SNVS_LPSR_SPO)
- mod_timer(&pdata->check_timer, jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(DEBOUNCE_TIME));
+       if (lp_status & SNVS_LPSR_SPO) {
+               if (pdata->minor_rev > 0)

here? Just a nitpick, feel free to add/drop it.

Like a Macro?

#define FIRST_HW_REV(pdata)      (pdata->minor_rev == 0)

if (FIRST_HW_REV(pdata) {
        ...
}


or just a define to identify the minor rev used for the first hw revision


#define FIRST_HW_MINOR_REV       0

if (pdata->minor_rev == FIRST_HW_MINOR_REV) {
        ...
}

Regards,
Robin van der Gracht

Reply via email to