>> * I would prefer to refer to a desired reduction of a few >> source code quality concerns. > > Not needed. I understand what is going on here.
I suggest to reconsider the interpretation of “ensurance” after only a few source code places were adjusted. >>> Changes in … >> >> Can such a prefix be omitted? > > Why? I think it makes sense? Can the specification of a version identifier be occasionally sufficient already? Regards, Markus
