Hi Gene,

Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[cannot apply to v5.3 next-20190917]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]

url:    
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Gene-Chen/mfd-mt6360-add-pmic-mt6360-driver/20190918-181850
config: x86_64-randconfig-s0-201937 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.4.0-13) 7.4.0
reproduce:
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make ARCH=x86_64 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <l...@intel.com>

All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from <command-line>:0:0:
>> include/linux/mfd/mt6360-private.h:234:51: warning: 'struct device_node' 
>> declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this 
>> definition or declaration
    static inline void mt6360_dt_parser_helper(struct device_node *np, void 
*data,
                                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~
   include/linux/mfd/mt6360-private.h: In function 'mt6360_dt_parser_helper':
>> include/linux/mfd/mt6360-private.h:243:3: error: implicit declaration of 
>> function 'of_property_read_u32' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
      of_property_read_u32(np, props[i].name, data + props[i].offset);
      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   include/linux/mfd/mt6360-private.h: In function 'mt6360_pdata_apply_helper':
>> include/linux/mfd/mt6360-private.h:271:9: error: implicit declaration of 
>> function 'regmap_update_bits'; did you mean 'work_data_bits'? 
>> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
      ret = regmap_update_bits(context,
            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
            work_data_bits
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

vim +/of_property_read_u32 +243 include/linux/mfd/mt6360-private.h

   233  
 > 234  static inline void mt6360_dt_parser_helper(struct device_node *np, void 
 > *data,
   235                                             const struct mt6360_val_prop 
*props,
   236                                             int prop_cnt)
   237  {
   238          int i;
   239  
   240          for (i = 0; i < prop_cnt; i++) {
   241                  if (unlikely(!props[i].name))
   242                          continue;
 > 243                  of_property_read_u32(np, props[i].name, data + 
 > props[i].offset);
   244          }
   245  }
   246  
   247  #define MT6360_PDATA_VALPROP(name, type, reg, shift, mask, func, base) \
   248                          {offsetof(type, name), reg, shift, mask, func, 
base}
   249  
   250  struct mt6360_pdata_prop {
   251          size_t offset;
   252          u8 reg;
   253          u8 shift;
   254          u8 mask;
   255          u32 (*transform)(u32 val);
   256          u8 base;
   257  };
   258  
   259  static inline int mt6360_pdata_apply_helper(void *context, void *pdata,
   260                                             const struct 
mt6360_pdata_prop *prop,
   261                                             int prop_cnt)
   262  {
   263          int i, ret;
   264          u32 val;
   265  
   266          for (i = 0; i < prop_cnt; i++) {
   267                  val = *(u32 *)(pdata + prop[i].offset);
   268                  if (prop[i].transform)
   269                          val = prop[i].transform(val);
   270                  val += prop[i].base;
 > 271                  ret = regmap_update_bits(context,
   272                               prop[i].reg, prop[i].mask, val << 
prop[i].shift);
   273                  if (ret < 0)
   274                          return ret;
   275          }
   276          return 0;
   277  }
   278  

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation

Attachment: .config.gz
Description: application/gzip

Reply via email to