When we tested pmdk unit test [1] vmmalloc_fork TEST1 in arm64 guest, there
will be a double page fault in __copy_from_user_inatomic of cow_user_page.

Below call trace is from arm64 do_page_fault for debugging purpose
[  110.016195] Call trace:
[  110.016826]  do_page_fault+0x5a4/0x690
[  110.017812]  do_mem_abort+0x50/0xb0
[  110.018726]  el1_da+0x20/0xc4
[  110.019492]  __arch_copy_from_user+0x180/0x280
[  110.020646]  do_wp_page+0xb0/0x860
[  110.021517]  __handle_mm_fault+0x994/0x1338
[  110.022606]  handle_mm_fault+0xe8/0x180
[  110.023584]  do_page_fault+0x240/0x690
[  110.024535]  do_mem_abort+0x50/0xb0
[  110.025423]  el0_da+0x20/0x24

The pte info before __copy_from_user_inatomic is (PTE_AF is cleared):
[ffff9b007000] pgd=000000023d4f8003, pud=000000023da9b003, 
pmd=000000023d4b3003, pte=360000298607bd3

As told by Catalin: "On arm64 without hardware Access Flag, copying from
user will fail because the pte is old and cannot be marked young. So we
always end up with zeroed page after fork() + CoW for pfn mappings. we
don't always have a hardware-managed access flag on arm64."

This patch fix it by calling pte_mkyoung. Also, the parameter is
changed because vmf should be passed to cow_user_page()

Add a WARN_ON_ONCE when __copy_from_user_inatomic() returns error
in case there can be some obscure use-case.(by Kirill)

[1] https://github.com/pmem/pmdk/tree/master/src/test/vmmalloc_fork

Reported-by: Yibo Cai <yibo....@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jia He <justin...@arm.com>
---
 mm/memory.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index e2bb51b6242e..ae09b070b04d 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -118,6 +118,13 @@ int randomize_va_space __read_mostly =
                                        2;
 #endif
 
+#ifndef arch_faults_on_old_pte
+static inline bool arch_faults_on_old_pte(void)
+{
+       return false;
+}
+#endif
+
 static int __init disable_randmaps(char *s)
 {
        randomize_va_space = 0;
@@ -2140,8 +2147,13 @@ static inline int pte_unmap_same(struct mm_struct *mm, 
pmd_t *pmd,
        return same;
 }
 
-static inline void cow_user_page(struct page *dst, struct page *src, unsigned 
long va, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+static inline bool cow_user_page(struct page *dst, struct page *src,
+                                struct vm_fault *vmf)
 {
+       struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma;
+       struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
+       unsigned long addr = vmf->address;
+
        debug_dma_assert_idle(src);
 
        /*
@@ -2151,21 +2163,53 @@ static inline void cow_user_page(struct page *dst, 
struct page *src, unsigned lo
         * fails, we just zero-fill it. Live with it.
         */
        if (unlikely(!src)) {
-               void *kaddr = kmap_atomic(dst);
-               void __user *uaddr = (void __user *)(va & PAGE_MASK);
+               void *kaddr;
+               pte_t entry;
+               void __user *uaddr = (void __user *)(addr & PAGE_MASK);
 
+               /* On architectures with software "accessed" bits, we would
+                * take a double page fault, so mark it accessed here.
+                */
+               if (arch_faults_on_old_pte() && !pte_young(vmf->orig_pte)) {
+                       vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, vmf->pmd, addr,
+                                                      &vmf->ptl);
+                       if (likely(pte_same(*vmf->pte, vmf->orig_pte))) {
+                               entry = pte_mkyoung(vmf->orig_pte);
+                               if (ptep_set_access_flags(vma, addr,
+                                                         vmf->pte, entry, 0))
+                                       update_mmu_cache(vma, addr, vmf->pte);
+                       } else {
+                               /* Other thread has already handled the fault
+                                * and we don't need to do anything. If it's
+                                * not the case, the fault will be triggered
+                                * again on the same address.
+                                */
+                               pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl);
+                               return false;
+                       }
+                       pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl);
+               }
+
+               kaddr = kmap_atomic(dst);
                /*
                 * This really shouldn't fail, because the page is there
                 * in the page tables. But it might just be unreadable,
                 * in which case we just give up and fill the result with
                 * zeroes.
                 */
-               if (__copy_from_user_inatomic(kaddr, uaddr, PAGE_SIZE))
+               if (__copy_from_user_inatomic(kaddr, uaddr, PAGE_SIZE)) {
+                       /* Give a warn in case there can be some obscure
+                        * use-case
+                        */
+                       WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
                        clear_page(kaddr);
+               }
                kunmap_atomic(kaddr);
                flush_dcache_page(dst);
        } else
-               copy_user_highpage(dst, src, va, vma);
+               copy_user_highpage(dst, src, addr, vma);
+
+       return true;
 }
 
 static gfp_t __get_fault_gfp_mask(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
@@ -2318,7 +2362,18 @@ static vm_fault_t wp_page_copy(struct vm_fault *vmf)
                                vmf->address);
                if (!new_page)
                        goto oom;
-               cow_user_page(new_page, old_page, vmf->address, vma);
+
+               if (!cow_user_page(new_page, old_page, vmf)) {
+                       /* COW failed, if the fault was solved by other,
+                        * it's fine. If not, userspace would re-fault on
+                        * the same address and we will handle the fault
+                        * from the second attempt.
+                        */
+                       put_page(new_page);
+                       if (old_page)
+                               put_page(old_page);
+                       return 0;
+               }
        }
 
        if (mem_cgroup_try_charge_delay(new_page, mm, GFP_KERNEL, &memcg, 
false))
-- 
2.17.1

Reply via email to