On 09/24/19 at 02:27pm, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Tue 24-09-19 19:11:51, Baoquan He wrote: > > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c > > index f3c15bb07cce..84e3fdb1ccb4 100644 > > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c > > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c > > @@ -4317,6 +4317,9 @@ void mem_cgroup_track_foreign_dirty_slowpath(struct > > page *page, > > > > trace_track_foreign_dirty(page, wb); > > > > + if (mem_cgroup_disabled()) > > + return; > > + > > This doesn't seem correct. We shouldn't even enter the slowpath with > memcg disabled AFAIC. The check should be done at > mem_cgroup_track_foreign_dirty > level.
You mean the way in v1 patch, right? It's also fine to me. I am worried about the case that memcg is enabled, the checking by calling mem_cgroup_disabled() will lower efficiency. And it entering into mem_cgroup_track_foreign_dirty_slowpath() should be a rare event. Thanks Baoquan
