On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 08:36:47AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
 >   
> >       timer@10050000 {
> >           compatible = "samsung,exynos4412-mct";
> >           reg = <0x10050000 0x800>;
> >   
> > -        interrupts = <0 57 0>, <0 69 0>, <0 70 0>, <0 71 0>,
> > -                     <0 42 0>;
> > +        interrupts = <GIC_SPI 57 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > +                     <GIC_SPI 69 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > +                     <GIC_SPI 70 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > +                     <GIC_SPI 71 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > +                     <GIC_SPI 42 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> 
> the last one should be GIC_PPI
> 
> >       };
> >   
> >     - |
> >       // In this example, the IP contains four local timers, but using
> >       // a per-processor interrupt to handle them. All the local timer
> >       // interrupts are specified.
> > +    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> >   
> >       timer@10050000 {
> >           compatible = "samsung,exynos4412-mct";
> >           reg = <0x10050000 0x800>;
> >   
> > -        interrupts = <0 57 0>, <0 69 0>, <0 70 0>, <0 71 0>,
> > -                     <0 42 0>, <0 42 0>, <0 42 0>, <0 42 0>;
> > +        interrupts = <GIC_SPI 57 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > +                     <GIC_SPI 69 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > +                     <GIC_SPI 70 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > +                     <GIC_SPI 71 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > +                     <GIC_SPI 42 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > +                     <GIC_SPI 42 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > +                     <GIC_SPI 42 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > +                     <GIC_SPI 42 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> 
> again, last 4 entries should use GIC_PPI

Indeed, thanks for noticing it.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Reply via email to