Quoting Taniya Das (2019-10-03 03:31:15) > Hi Stephen, > > On 10/1/2019 8:08 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > Why do you want to keep them critical and registered? I'm suggesting > > that any clk that is marked critical and doesn't have a parent should > > instead become a register write in probe to turn the clk on. > > > Sure, let me do a one-time enable from probe for the clocks which > doesn't have a parent. > But I would now have to educate the clients of these clocks to remove > using them. >
If anyone is using these clks we can return NULL from the provider for the specifier so that we indicate there isn't support for them in the kernel. At least I hope that code path still works given all the recent changes to clk_get().
