> On Oct 8, 2019, at 4:40 AM, Michal Hocko <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Does this tip point to a real deadlock or merely a class of lockdep
> false dependencies?

I lean towards it is a real deadlock given how trivial to generate those lock 
orders everywhere. On the other hand, it make a little different to spend too 
much time arguing the authentic of those reproducible locdep splats, as even 
false positives could be as bad for developers where it would disable the whole 
lockdep and mask off other true deadlock could happen later.

Reply via email to