On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 16:05:41 +0200, Lars Poeschel wrote:
> There is a problem in the initialisation and setup of the pn533: It
> registers with nfc too early. It could happen, that it finished
> registering with nfc and someone starts using it. But setup of the pn533
> is not yet finished. Bad or at least unintended things could happen.
> So I split out nfc registering (and unregistering) to seperate functions
> that have to be called late in probe then.
>
> Cc: Johan Hovold <[email protected]>
> Cc: Claudiu Beznea <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Lars Poeschel <[email protected]>
> diff --git a/drivers/nfc/pn533/i2c.c b/drivers/nfc/pn533/i2c.c
> index 1abd40398a5a..e9e5a1ec8857 100644
> --- a/drivers/nfc/pn533/i2c.c
> +++ b/drivers/nfc/pn533/i2c.c
> @@ -193,12 +193,10 @@ static int pn533_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> phy->i2c_dev = client;
> i2c_set_clientdata(client, phy);
>
> - priv = pn533_register_device(PN533_DEVICE_PN532,
> - PN533_NO_TYPE_B_PROTOCOLS,
> + priv = pn53x_common_init(PN533_DEVICE_PN532,
> PN533_PROTO_REQ_ACK_RESP,
> phy, &i2c_phy_ops, NULL,
> - &phy->i2c_dev->dev,
> - &client->dev);
> + &phy->i2c_dev->dev);
nit: start of continuation lines should match the opening parenthesis,
please run checkpatch and fix the style issue
> if (IS_ERR(priv)) {
> r = PTR_ERR(priv);
> @@ -220,13 +218,17 @@ static int pn533_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> if (r)
> goto fn_setup_err;
>
> - return 0;
> + r = pn53x_register_nfc(priv, PN533_NO_TYPE_B_PROTOCOLS, &client->dev);
> + if (r)
> + goto fn_setup_err;
> +
> + return r;
>
> fn_setup_err:
> free_irq(client->irq, phy);
>
> irq_rqst_err:
> - pn533_unregister_device(phy->priv);
> + pn53x_common_clean(phy->priv);
>
> return r;
> }
> @@ -239,7 +241,8 @@ static int pn533_i2c_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>
> free_irq(client->irq, phy);
>
> - pn533_unregister_device(phy->priv);
> + pn53x_unregister_nfc(phy->priv);
> + pn53x_common_clean(phy->priv);
>
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/nfc/pn533/pn533.c b/drivers/nfc/pn533/pn533.c
> index 64836c727aee..e5d5e4c83a04 100644
> --- a/drivers/nfc/pn533/pn533.c
> +++ b/drivers/nfc/pn533/pn533.c
> @@ -2590,14 +2590,12 @@ int pn533_finalize_setup(struct pn533 *dev)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pn533_finalize_setup);
>
> -struct pn533 *pn533_register_device(u32 device_type,
> - u32 protocols,
> +struct pn533 *pn53x_common_init(u32 device_type,
> enum pn533_protocol_type protocol_type,
> void *phy,
> struct pn533_phy_ops *phy_ops,
> struct pn533_frame_ops *fops,
> - struct device *dev,
> - struct device *parent)
> + struct device *dev)
> {
> struct pn533 *priv;
> int rc = -ENOMEM;
> @@ -2638,43 +2636,18 @@ struct pn533 *pn533_register_device(u32 device_type,
> skb_queue_head_init(&priv->fragment_skb);
>
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->cmd_queue);
> -
> - priv->nfc_dev = nfc_allocate_device(&pn533_nfc_ops, protocols,
> - priv->ops->tx_header_len +
> - PN533_CMD_DATAEXCH_HEAD_LEN,
> - priv->ops->tx_tail_len);
> - if (!priv->nfc_dev) {
> - rc = -ENOMEM;
> - goto destroy_wq;
> - }
> -
> - nfc_set_parent_dev(priv->nfc_dev, parent);
> - nfc_set_drvdata(priv->nfc_dev, priv);
> -
> - rc = nfc_register_device(priv->nfc_dev);
> - if (rc)
> - goto free_nfc_dev;
Aren't you moving too much out of here? Looking at commit 32ecc75ded72
("NFC: pn533: change order operations in dev registation") it seems like
IRQ handler may want to access the data structures, do this change not
reintroduce the problem?
> return priv;
>
> -free_nfc_dev:
> - nfc_free_device(priv->nfc_dev);
> -
> -destroy_wq:
> - destroy_workqueue(priv->wq);
> error:
> kfree(priv);
> return ERR_PTR(rc);
> }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pn533_register_device);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pn53x_common_init);
>
> -void pn533_unregister_device(struct pn533 *priv)
> +void pn53x_common_clean(struct pn533 *priv)
> {
> struct pn533_cmd *cmd, *n;
>
> - nfc_unregister_device(priv->nfc_dev);
> - nfc_free_device(priv->nfc_dev);
> -
> flush_delayed_work(&priv->poll_work);
> destroy_workqueue(priv->wq);
>
