Em Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:21:39AM -0700, Andi Kleen escreveu:
> From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
> 
> My earlier patch to just enable --reltime with --time was a little too 
> optimistic.
> The --time parsing would accept absolute time, which is very confusing to the 
> user.
> 
> Support relative time in --time parsing too. This only works with recent perf
> record that records the first sample time. Otherwise we error out.

Thanks, applied both patches.

- Arnaldo
 
> Fixes: 3714437d3fcc ("perf script: Allow --time with --reltime")
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
> ---
>  tools/perf/builtin-script.c  |  5 +++--
>  tools/perf/util/time-utils.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  tools/perf/util/time-utils.h |  5 +++++
>  3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
> index 1c797a948ada..f86c5cce5b2c 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
> @@ -3864,10 +3864,11 @@ int cmd_script(int argc, const char **argv)
>               goto out_delete;
>  
>       if (script.time_str) {
> -             err = perf_time__parse_for_ranges(script.time_str, session,
> +             err = perf_time__parse_for_ranges_reltime(script.time_str, 
> session,
>                                                 &script.ptime_range,
>                                                 &script.range_size,
> -                                               &script.range_num);
> +                                               &script.range_num,
> +                                               reltime);
>               if (err < 0)
>                       goto out_delete;
>  
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c
> index 9796a2e43f67..302443921681 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c
> @@ -458,10 +458,11 @@ bool perf_time__ranges_skip_sample(struct 
> perf_time_interval *ptime_buf,
>       return true;
>  }
>  
> -int perf_time__parse_for_ranges(const char *time_str,
> +int perf_time__parse_for_ranges_reltime(const char *time_str,
>                               struct perf_session *session,
>                               struct perf_time_interval **ranges,
> -                             int *range_size, int *range_num)
> +                             int *range_size, int *range_num,
> +                             bool reltime)
>  {
>       bool has_percent = strchr(time_str, '%');
>       struct perf_time_interval *ptime_range;
> @@ -471,7 +472,7 @@ int perf_time__parse_for_ranges(const char *time_str,
>       if (!ptime_range)
>               return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -     if (has_percent) {
> +     if (has_percent || reltime) {
>               if (session->evlist->first_sample_time == 0 &&
>                   session->evlist->last_sample_time == 0) {
>                       pr_err("HINT: no first/last sample time found in perf 
> data.\n"
> @@ -479,7 +480,9 @@ int perf_time__parse_for_ranges(const char *time_str,
>                              "(if '--buildid-all' is enabled, please set 
> '--timestamp-boundary').\n");
>                       goto error;
>               }
> +     }
>  
> +     if (has_percent) {
>               num = perf_time__percent_parse_str(
>                               ptime_range, size,
>                               time_str,
> @@ -492,6 +495,15 @@ int perf_time__parse_for_ranges(const char *time_str,
>       if (num < 0)
>               goto error_invalid;
>  
> +     if (reltime) {
> +             int i;
> +
> +             for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
> +                     ptime_range[i].start += 
> session->evlist->first_sample_time;
> +                     ptime_range[i].end += 
> session->evlist->first_sample_time;
> +             }
> +     }
> +
>       *range_size = size;
>       *range_num = num;
>       *ranges = ptime_range;
> @@ -504,6 +516,15 @@ int perf_time__parse_for_ranges(const char *time_str,
>       return ret;
>  }
>  
> +int perf_time__parse_for_ranges(const char *time_str,
> +                             struct perf_session *session,
> +                             struct perf_time_interval **ranges,
> +                             int *range_size, int *range_num)
> +{
> +     return perf_time__parse_for_ranges_reltime(time_str, session, ranges,
> +                                     range_size, range_num, false);
> +}
> +
>  int timestamp__scnprintf_usec(u64 timestamp, char *buf, size_t sz)
>  {
>       u64  sec = timestamp / NSEC_PER_SEC;
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/time-utils.h b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.h
> index 4f42988eb2f7..1142b0bddd5e 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/time-utils.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.h
> @@ -26,6 +26,11 @@ bool perf_time__ranges_skip_sample(struct 
> perf_time_interval *ptime_buf,
>  
>  struct perf_session;
>  
> +int perf_time__parse_for_ranges_reltime(const char *str, struct perf_session 
> *session,
> +                             struct perf_time_interval **ranges,
> +                             int *range_size, int *range_num,
> +                             bool reltime);
> +
>  int perf_time__parse_for_ranges(const char *str, struct perf_session 
> *session,
>                               struct perf_time_interval **ranges,
>                               int *range_size, int *range_num);
> -- 
> 2.21.0

-- 

- Arnaldo

Reply via email to