Hi! > From: Erik Schmauss <[email protected]> > > Commit b5eab512e7cffb2bb37c4b342b5594e9e75fd486 upstream.
So this introduces another format of "upstream" information. So far I
had this:
ma = re.match(".*Upstream commit ([0-9a-f]*) .*", l)
...
ma = re.match("commit ([0-9a-f]*) upstream[.]*", l)
I believe this information belongs to the signoff area; it is
important to know who pushed patch to the upstream and who is pusing
it to the stable.
Could we just introduce "Upstream: <sha1>" tag and use it? It would
improve consistency...
Thanks,
Pavel
> ACPICA commit c736ea34add19a3a07e0e398711847cd6b95affd
>
> Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/c736ea34
> Signed-off-by: Erik Schmauss <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
