On 18-10-19, 14:22, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> Allow qcom-hw driver to initialise right after the cpufreq and thermal
> subsystems are initialised in core_initcall so we get earlier access to
> thermal mitigation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Taniya Das <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c 
> b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> index a9ae2f84a4efc..fc92a8842e252 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static int __init qcom_cpufreq_hw_init(void)
>  {
>       return platform_driver_register(&qcom_cpufreq_hw_driver);
>  }
> -device_initcall(qcom_cpufreq_hw_init);
> +postcore_initcall(qcom_cpufreq_hw_init);
>  
>  static void __exit qcom_cpufreq_hw_exit(void)
>  {

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>

-- 
viresh

Reply via email to