On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 6:45 AM Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 13:22:37 +0200 > Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 06:10:45PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > But still, we are going from 120 to 660 IPIs for every CPU. Not saying > > > it's a problem, but something that we should note. Someone (those that > > > don't like kernel interference) may complain. > > > > It is machine wide function tracing, interference is going to happen.. > > :-) > > > > Anyway, we can grow the batch size if sufficient benefit can be shown to > > exist. > > Yeah, I was thinking that we just go with these patches and then fix > the IPI issue when someone starts complaining ;-) > > Anyway, is this series ready to go? I can pull them in (I guess I > should get an ack from Thomas or Ingo as they are x86 specific). I'm > currently working on code that affects the same code paths as this > patch, and would like to build my changes on top of this, instead of > monkeying around with major conflicts.
What is the status of this set ? Steven, did you apply it ?