On 05/06/2020 12:16 PM, Gavin Shan wrote:
> The function add_huge_page_size(), wrapper of hugetlb_add_hstate(),
> avoids to register duplicated huge page states for same size. However,
> the same logic has been included in hugetlb_add_hstate(). So it seems
> unnecessary to keep add_huge_page_size() and this just removes it.
Makes sense.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 18 +++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> index bbeb6a5a6ba6..ed7530413941 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> @@ -441,22 +441,14 @@ void huge_ptep_clear_flush(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> clear_flush(vma->vm_mm, addr, ptep, pgsize, ncontig);
> }
>
> -static void __init add_huge_page_size(unsigned long size)
> -{
> - if (size_to_hstate(size))
> - return;
> -
> - hugetlb_add_hstate(ilog2(size) - PAGE_SHIFT);
> -}
> -
> static int __init hugetlbpage_init(void)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES
> - add_huge_page_size(PUD_SIZE);
> + hugetlb_add_hstate(PUD_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT);
> #endif
> - add_huge_page_size(CONT_PMD_SIZE);
> - add_huge_page_size(PMD_SIZE);
> - add_huge_page_size(CONT_PTE_SIZE);
> + hugetlb_add_hstate(CONT_PMD_SHIFT + PMD_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT);
> + hugetlb_add_hstate(PMD_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT);
> + hugetlb_add_hstate(CONT_PTE_SHIFT);
Should these page order values be converted into macros instead. Also
we should probably keep (CONT_PTE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) as
is to make things more clear.
