On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 12:31:21PM +0000, Stefan Chulski wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Matteo Croce <[email protected]> > > Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2020 3:16 PM > > To: Stefan Chulski <[email protected]> > > Cc: David S . Miller <[email protected]>; Maxime Chevallier > > <[email protected]>; netdev <[email protected]>; LKML > > <[email protected]>; Antoine Tenart > > <[email protected]>; Thomas Petazzoni > > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > > [email protected]; Nadav Haklai <[email protected]>; Marcin > > Wojtas <[email protected]>; Linux ARM <linux-arm- > > [email protected]>; Russell King - ARM Linux admin > > <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH net-next 3/5] net: mvpp2: cls: Use RSS > > contexts to > > handle RSS tables > > > > Hi, > > > > The point is that RXHASH works fine on all interfaces, but on the gigabit > > one > > (eth2 usually). > > And on the 10 gbit interface is very very effective, the throughput goes 4x > > when > > enabled, so it would be a big drawback to disable it on all interfaces. > > > > Honestly I don't have any 2.5 gbit hardware to test it on eth3, so I don't > > know if > > rxhash actually only works on the first interface of a unit (so eth0 and > > eth1), or > > if it just doesn't work on the gigabit one. > > > > If someone could test it on the 2.5 gbit port, this will be helpful. > > RSS tables is part of Packet Processor IP, not MAC(so it's not related to > specific speed). Probably issue exist on specific packet processor ports. > Since RSS work fine on first port of the CP, we can do the following: > if (port-> id == 0) > dev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_RXHASH;
I can confirm that Macchiatobin Single Shot eth0 port works with a 1G Fibre SFP or 10G DA SFP with or without rxhash on. So it seems Stefan's hunch that it is port related is correct. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 10.2Mbps down 587kbps up
